Saturday, October 25, 2008

News as Research

I grew up learning that good essayists challenges their own ideas by reading sources that oppose their own view, and even presenting their arguments in their own essay. People expect responsible journalists to give both sides of the issue.

I see too much of biased journalism. I also see too much misrepresenting the other side of the issue, or cases where there are many sides of an issue.

I think the real problem is not just with news agencies. It is with people who don't seek alternative viewpoints that challenge their own ideas. This is at the core of real science--testing your own hypothesis means challenging it with any alternatives you can dream up.

It's time to start doing real research, people. It's time to start verifying sources, to start seeking out opposing viewpoints and subscribing to them (even if you don't agree, you are better informed if you read them).

Of course, nobody can afford to read every story in triplicate (their favorite journalist/news source, an opposing viewpoint, and an alternative third viewpoint). I think this is what the scriptures mean when they say every man ought to be engaged in a good cause. But I think it behooves us, when questions of national importance come up, or when we have an opportunity to vote with either ballots, donations, or our time--it behooves us to be informed. That means learning two other viewpoints, and questioning whether another viewpoint might exist. That means praying for help to see what is right, and then: "It becometh every man who has been warned to warn his neighbor."

Sometimes (or often) you won't agree with friends on what you've learned. So learn to be able to peaceable disagree, and learn to exchange research sources rather than emotional exchanges of words.

This I tell myself. Now off I go to read the other presidential candidate's site. And a third presidential candidate's website.

-----
Articles that triggered this blog post include Orson Scott Card's essays on the current election situation. He's a democrat, but he opposes Obama. I oppose obama, but I am not a democrat. We don't see eye to eye on everything, but I think his essays have a lot of good to say.
http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081017light.html
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2008-10-12-1.html

Friday, October 10, 2008

End User License Agreements.

Okay, I realize people tend not to read license agreements. But when I see things like this in a EULA, I think "Did anyone review this?" and I realize these people have little respect for their customers:

Mozy.home's license agreement has the phrase: "Do not taunt happy fun ball." No kidding. And here's the scary part: the license also says they can modify it anytime, and will only post a notice on their website for 15 days. Moreover, they reserve the right to delete your data, and claim absolutely no liability for loss of data, etc. There's nothing about privacy, so even though data is encrypted, who knows if they don't also have the key? Bleh. Forget mozy online backups--I have no confidence in the security of putting my data on their servers.

If you want something worth having, pay for it. I think I'm going to buy Norton Ghost or SyncbackSE.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Truth value and All Statements.

Please indicate whether each of the following sentences is true or false. If it is neither, then describe what it is instead and explain how something can be neither true or false.

I do not guarantee I have the correct answers for all of them.

"This sentence is either true or false."
"This statement is false."
"This sentence is a lie."
"This sentence is not true."
"This sentence is not true if it's not nonsense."
"This sentence is also nonsense."
"This statement is as true as the one before it."
"This statement is true if it's not nonsense."
"If a sentence must be true or false, then this is neither."
"This phrase is not true, but this sentence is."
"This phrase is true, but this sentence is not."
"Sometimes this sentence is nonsensical."
"Sometimes this sentence is true."
"This statement is never what it appears to be."
"This statement is always untrue."
"This statement might be false."
"This statement might be true."
"It is not clear whether this sentence is true or false."

Finally, can you come up with a sentence that would stump someone who has correctly categorized all of the above sentences?